Why staying is usually the right call.

FileMaker still fits when the system works, the staff know it, the maintenance is reasonable, and no specific business need is being blocked. Replacing a working system means paying to rebuild years of logic you already own — and betting the business on that rebuild. Staying, documenting it properly, and extending where it falls short is cheaper, faster, and lower-risk.

Keep it healthy: stewardship.

I look after the system on a monthly retainer: maintenance, fixes, moves to new hosting and new macOS or Windows versions, small changes. You get a developer who answers, and a short written report every month, filed inside your own FileMaker system next to a running list of every account, license and renewal it depends on. Your daily brief and up to two live boards are part of it too, along with one-click problem reports and a warning 30 days before any license, security certificate or domain runs out. How stewardship works, and what it costs.

Extend past the limits.

When FileMaker can't reach far enough — a customer portal, mobile access for the field, a payment form, an integration, a live dashboard — you add web screens next to the FileMaker you already run. Your staff keep the tool they know; the missing capability shows up beside it, on services in your own name. See exactly how that's built, and a worked example.

The reasons people think they have to leave — and the stay-and-extend answer.

When staying isn't the answer.

Sometimes leaving is the right call, and I'll tell you when it is — I build in and out of FileMaker, so "stay" from me is a real recommendation, not the only one I can afford to give. Here's the leave path.